Company Stock Prices Fall When Women Are Added To Boards Of Directors
Get link
Facebook
X
Pinterest
Email
Other Apps
Company Stock Prices Fall When Women Are Added To Boards Of Directors
Turns out that many companies who seek to embrace equality by any means could actually be doing their shareholders a disservice. But hey, we thought equality of outcome was a guaranteed fast track to utopia! What happened?
In fact, many companies experience stock price declines when women are added to the board of directors, Bloomberg points out.
An analysis of 14 years of market returns across almost 1,900 companies recently revealed that when companies appoint female directors, they experienced two years of stock declines. Companies saw their stock fall by an average of 2.3% just from adding one additional woman to their board.
Kaisa Snellman, an assistant professor of organizational behavior at INSEAD business school and a co-author of the study said: "Shareholders penalize these companies, despite the fact that increased gender diversity doesn’t have a material effect on a company’s return on assets. Nothing happens to the actual value of the companies. It’s just the perceptions that change.”
The study suggests that investor biases are to blame. The study asked senior managers with MBAs to read fictional press releases announcing new board members. The statements were identical, but for the gender of the incoming director. Participants said that men were more likely to care about profits and less about social values, while women were deemed to be "softer".
Snellman continued: “If anyone is biased, it is the market. Investors should consider organizations that add women and other under-represented groups to their boards because there's a good chance that company is being undervalued.”
Despite this study's findings, other non-academic reports over the years have suggested that diverse leadership results in corporate success. A McKinsey analysis concluded that board diversity correlates with positive financial performance and a 2019 Credit Suisse report noted a "performance premium for board diversity".
These findings have prompted investors like BlackRock to push for diversity on boards. Women now account for more than 25% of board members on the S&P 500 and 20% of boards globally.
“It has become kind of a myth. Add a woman on your board, and a company starts doing better,” Snellman continued.
Results remain mixed when looking into diversity, however. An analysis from September showed share prices rose after companies showed better than average levels of gender diversity. Another study from October found that investors punished companies without female directors after California passed a law mandating that all boards in the state must have one woman by the end of this year. The researchers suspected that the market was reacting to the lack of compliance with the new rules for many companies.
Snellman counted 140 research papers that showed no clear relationship between adding diversity and improving performance metrics.
Snellman concluded: “Just to be very clear, I'm not saying that we should not promote female leaders into senior leader positions. But is there a business case for gender diversity on boards? If you ask an academic, the answer is no.”
2 Ohio officers fired for their strip-club arrest of Stormy Daniels https://t.co/S0qZRa3WIc via @nbcnews — Bingo Pajama (@LurkerInTheLoft) January 24, 2020
Trump for reasons not yet known is a WITTING TOOL OF PUTIN and the Russians. His withdrawal of 12,000 troops from Germany puts a fracture in the NATO defense structure. He will not acknowledge US intelligence of Russian bounties on US troops .. incredible. — Barry R McCaffrey (@mccaffreyr3) July 30, 2020 General just used “WITTING” in all caps. Not insignificant. Noted. https://t.co/wVDZG7RNWR — Lincoln's Bible (@LincolnsBible) July 30, 2020 NEW: President Trump tells @jonathanvswan on #AxiosOnHBO that he didn't raise the issue of alleged bounties on U.S. troops during his call with Vladimir Putin last week: "That was a phone call to discuss other things." pic.twitter.com/daISvMFUE1 — Axios (@axios) July 29, 2020 The Axios interview is even worse than it appeared at first glance: Trump defends Russia supplying weapons to the Taliban (!). "Well, we supplied weapons when they were fighting Russia." Who on earth talks like this? https://t.co/Q7amdresPz @j...
First, They Think You're Crazy... Authored by Sven Henrich via NorthmanTrader.com, 80's Party First they think you’re crazy and then they’ll join you. On January 14th I outlined a rather obvious appearing correlation between the Fed’s repo operations and the market’s behavior: Every day, no matter what happens or what data is thrown at this market the same pattern repeats: Markets are jammed higher following the Fed’s repo operations. It is this chart I’ve been posting on twitter every day since and no change to the pattern: This has been going on for a while and has gone into overdrive since early December, the last real dip in markets: “ Since the beginning of December, the combined reserve management purchases plus repo injections has been approximately $400 bn." The impact on the market’s behavior is now obvious in the charts, nothing but 45 degree channel price levitation: And while folks like myself are being dismissed as QE conspiracy theorists the Wall Street Jou...
Comments
Post a Comment